Hallo,
ich habe auch länger gebraucht, mich der Realität zu beugen:
In einem anderen Thread wurde auf einen Artikel von Kirk NT0Z, dem Autor von Stealth Amateur verwiesen. Abgesehen von den anderen Gedanken haben mich zwei Absätze getroffen:
ZitatAs highlighted later in this column, our antennas define our experience of amateur radio. Crap antennas equal crappy experiences overall. And while hams from my generation are dreaming about tall towers with stacks of big Yagis (already having real outdoor dipoles and loops), many newbies are dreaming about a too-low wire dipoles hidden in their backyard trees, or outdoor antennas of any type. And while they dream they're messing with what are essentially expensive non-antennas, and they're wondering why ham radio isn't so nifty.
These new hams are often surprised when I tell them that, if I could have a stack of killer antennas on top of a killer-high tower, I'd gladly trade my fancy new transceiver - any fancy new transceiver-for a 1970s Kenwood, Heathkit or Yaesu rig, which they view as anachronistic and completely useless. No questions asked. You can make up for a compromised radio, but you can't make up for a compromised antenna. Or can you?
Ich habe versucht mit kompromiss-behafteten Antennen zu arbeiten ... Es geht, aber irgendwann macht es keinen Spass mehr, wenn man mitbekommt, was mit einer richtigen Antenne möglich gewesen wäre.
73 der Hajo